Science Fair Abstract Guidelines
Abstract Guidelines, Grading Rubric
Abstract Guidelines
Although the abstract goes at the beginning of a research paper, it is the last piece written because is summarizes all parts of your research (purpose, hypotheses/predictions, methods, results and conclusion).
- Teams will write one abstract per project.
- Abstracts must be submitted on the Abstract form with 22 categories. Be sure to check the appropriate category and boxes at the bottom, and save a copy on your computer. If you need help selecting a category, use the descriptions listed at Intel ISEF Categories and Subcategories.
- Review the guidelines for writing an Abstract on page 27 of the 2017 Rules and Guidelines (https://student.societyforscience.org/intel-isef-forms).
- Review the Abstract Grading Rubric prior to writing your abstract. Remember, no personal pronouns.
- DO NOT ATTACH ABSTRACT TO YOUR DISPLAY BOARD. SUBMIT IT SEPARATELY.
ABSTRACT GRADING RUBRIC
Note: Obtain a printed copy (pdf) of this Rubric from your science teacher and include this rubric with your abstract. Do not staple the pages together!
Requirement
Requirement
Formatting
Accomplished (4 points)
Abstract is typed OR Abstract is on official ISEF form
Developing (2-3 points)
Abstract is typed OR Abstract is on official ISEF form
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Abstract is not typed AND Abstract is not on official ISEF form
Requirement
Mechanics
Accomplished (4 points)
No errors in grammar/mechanics/spelling AND Paper does not exceed 250 words
Developing (2-3 points)
Few errors in grammar/mechanics/spelling OR Paper exceeds 250 words
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Many errors in grammar/mechanics/spelling AND Paper exceeds 250 words
Requirement
Purpose and Hypothesis/Goal
Accomplished (4 points)
Clear statement of purpose AND Clear statement of hypothesis or engineering goals
Developing (2-3 points)
Vague/missing statement of purpose OR Vague/missing hypothesis or engineering goals
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Vague/missing statement of purpose AND Vague/missing hypothesis or engineering goals
Requirement
Methods
Accomplished (4 points)
Summary of methods is clear
Developing (2-3 points)
Summary of methods is vague
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Summary of methods is missing
Requirement
Observations/Data
Accomplished (4 points)
Key observations/data are concisely and clearly summarized.
Developing (2-3 points)
Key observations/data are vague/incomplete, or are not concisely summarized.
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Key observations/ data are vague/incomplete, and not concisely summarized, OR are missing entirely
Requirement
Conclusions and Applications
Accomplished (4 points)
Conclusions/applications are clear AND Conclusions supported by the observations/data
Developing (2-3 points)
Conclusions/applications are vague OR Conclusions are not supported by the observations/data
Incomplete (0-1 points)
Conclusions/applications are vague AND Conclusions not supported by the observations/data
Subtotal points: _____/24 points Late work deduction (-10% per class): _____ TOTAL: _____/24 points |