Science Fair Grading Rubric
View the Grading Rubric
Presentation (27 points)
Category: Time Limit
Undeveloped
Presentation exceeds the time limit by more than 2 minutes and is stopped by the teacher.
0 points
Emerging
Presentation exceeds time limit by no more than 2 minutes.
1 point
Developing
Presentation exceeds time limit by no more than 1 minute.
2 points
Well Developed
Presentation does not exceed 5-8 minutes.
3 points
Category: Content
Undeveloped
Students present few aspects of the project clearly, concisely, and logically. Numerous ambiguities and/or omissions make it difficult for the audience to understand the project.
0 points
Emerging
Students present some aspects of the project clearly, concisely, and logically. Ambiguities and/or omissions prevent the audience from understanding the project.
3 points
Developing
Students present most aspects of the project clearly, concisely, and logically. Minor ambiguities and/or omissions do not prevent the audience from understanding the project.
6 points
Well Developed
Students present all aspects of the project clearly, concisely, and logically so the audience understand the project.
9 points
Category: Poise
Undeveloped
Presentation skills are lacking entirely; it appears little or no preparation was done. Presentation lacks enthusiasm and confidence, and students regularly lose eye contact, turn their backs on the audience, and fidget with their clothing/hair/etc.
0 points
Emerging
Presentation skills need significant improvement; it appears minimal preparation was done. Presentation lacks enthusiasm or confidence, and students regularly lose eye contact, turn their backs on the audience, and/or fidget with their clothing/hair/etc.
2 points
Developing
Presentation skills need minor improvement; it appears some advanced preparation was done. Presentation lacks enthusiasm or confidence, or students occasionally lose eye contact, turn their backs on the audience, or fidget with their clothing/hair/etc.
4 points
Well Developed
Students present all information confidently and display enthusiasm for the project. Students face the audience, maintain eye contact, and do not read from the display board or notes. Advanced preparation is clearly evident.
6 points
Category: Oral Skills
Undeveloped
Students consistently mumble, speak softly/quickly, and do not address all members of the audience.
0 points
Emerging
Students frequently mumble or speak softly/quickly, and do not address all members of the audience.
2 points
Developing
Students occasionally mumble or speak softly/quickly, or do not address all members of the audience.
4 points
Well Developed
Students speak clearly all of the time with good volume and speed, and address all members of the audience.
6 points
Category: Q & A Session
Undeveloped
Students do not respond respectfully to their peers, and cannot answer basic questions accurately and clearly (within reason). Students demonstrate no understanding of their topic.
0 points
Emerging
Students do not respond respectfully to their peers, or can answer only some basic questions accurately and clearly (within reason). Students demonstrate minimal understanding of their topic.
1 point
Developing
Students respond respectfully to their peers, but can answer only some questions accurately and clearly (within reason). Students demonstrate a basic understanding of their topic.
2 points
Well Developed
Students respond respectfully to their peers, and can answer most questions accurately and clearly with appropriate detail (within reason). Students demonstrate a strong understanding of their topic.
3 points
Poster (21 Points)
Category: Size & Layout
Undeveloped
Poster size does not meet ISEF requirements AND multiple sections are missing or out of order.
0 points
Emerging
Poster size does not meet ISEF requirements OR multiple sections are missing or out of order.
1 point
Developing
Poster size does not meet ISEF requirements OR a section is missing or out of order.
2 points
Well Developed
Poster size meets ISEF requirements, and contains all sections in the appropriate order.
3 points
Category: Content
Undeveloped
Few sections convey the information correctly; 5 or more sections may be vague, or may be too long/short.
0 points
Emerging
Some sections convey the information correctly; 3-4 sections may be vague, or may be too long/short.
3 points
Developing
Most sections convey the information correctly, but 1-2 sections may be vague, or may be too long/short.
6 points
Well Developed
All sections clearly, concisely and correctly convey the information needed to understand the project.
9 points
Category: Aesthetics
Undeveloped
Display board is very difficult to follow because it is messy, not organized well, lacks labels, and/or might be missing required sections of the project.
0 points
Emerging
Display board is somewhat difficult to follow because it is messy, not organized well, lacks labels, or might be missing required sections of the project.
1 point
Developing
Display board is functional and has adequate artistic value. It displays all required sections of the project.
2 points
Well Developed
Display board presents all information easily and neatly, and has a higher artistic value. Much time and care is evident.
3 points
Category: Writing Conventions and Citations
Undeveloped
There are 7+ more errors in mechanics, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or APA format (bibliography). None of the pictures, diagrams, etc., have proper captions and citations.
0 points
Emerging
There are 5-6 errors in mechanics, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or APA format (bibliography). Some pictures, diagrams, etc., have proper captions and citations.
2 point
Developing
There are 3-4 errors in mechanics, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or APA format (bibliography). Most pictures, diagrams, etc., have proper captions and citations.
4 points
Well Developed
There are 0-2 errors in mechanics, grammar, spelling, punctuation, or APA format (bibliography). All pictures, diagrams, etc., have proper captions and citations.
6 points
Research Project: Experimental Design and Scientific Knowledge (48 points)
Category: Purpose
Undeveloped
The purpose is missing.
0 points
Emerging
The purpose is vague and/or too lengthy.
1 point
Developing
The purpose is clear, but is too lengthy.
2 points
Well Developed
Purpose is clear and concise.
3 points
Category: Hypothesis
Undeveloped
The hypothesis and predicted results are missing.
0 points
Emerging
The hypothesis does not clearly discuss the relationship between variables. Predicted results cannot be measured quantitatively.
1 point
Developing
The hypothesis does not clearly discuss the relationship between variables, or the results cannot be measured quantitatively.
2 points
Well Developed
The hypothesis clearly discusses the relationship between the variables. The predicted results are can be measured quantitatively.
3 points
Category: Methods
Undeveloped
The methods show no understanding of the scientific method. There are errors in 4-5 required items, or the methods are missing.
0 points
Emerging
The methods show a weak understanding of the scientific method. There are errors in 2-3 required items.
3 points
Developing
The methods show a good understanding of the scientific method, but there is an error in 1 required item.
6 points
Well Developed
The methods show a strong understanding of the scientific method.Methods are complete and clear enough to be reproduced. Methods are appropriate for the hypothesis tested; IV & DV are appropriate. There are adequate experimental and control groups, and constants. Trials are repeated. Quantitative data is collected.
9 points
Category: Data
Undeveloped
The data is missing or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, and/or there are 5 or more errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
0 points
Emerging
The data is incomplete or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, or there are 3-4 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
3 points
Developing
The data is complete and well organized, but the tables/graphs may not be the most appropriate, or there are a 1-2 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
6 points
Well Developed
Data is complete and well organized into appropriate tables and graphs that are neat and easy to read. Tables and graphs have proper titles, measurement units, row/column/axis labels; graph axes are correctly scaled. Statistical analyses are included, when appropriate.
9 points
Category: Conclusion
Undeveloped
The conclusion is missing OR the data analysis, inconsistencies in the data, limitations and sources of error in the experiment, and future questions are incomplete or vague, or multiple items are missing.
0 points
Emerging
Conclusion provides an inadequate analysis of the data. There are significant errors in interpretation of the data and/or limited insight is provided. There is an inadequate discussion of inconsistencies in the data, limitations and sources of error in the experiment, and future questions. The discussion may lack thorough analysis of 2 or more of these items, and/or there are significant errors in the discussion.
4 points
Developing
Conclusion provides an adequate analysis of the data, but there are minor errors in interpretation of the data or limited insight provided. There is an adequate discussion of inconsistencies in the data, limitations and sources of error in the experiment, and future questions. However, the discussion may lack thorough analysis of 1 of these items, or there are only minor errors in the discussion.
8 points
Well Developed
Conclusion provides a clear, thorough, accurate, and insightful interpretation of the data. Discusses any inconsistencies or unexpected results and possible factors/errors that may have led to the results. Conclusion addresses limitations of the experiment and sources of errors, and provided possible solutions to address them. Possible future experiments and/or new research questions are included.
12 points
Category: Practical Application
Undeveloped
Practical applications are missing.
0 points
Emerging
Practical applications are vague. They may not be relevant or related to the topic studied.
1 point
Developing
Practical applications are relevant and related to the topic studied, but they are not clearly described.
2 points
Well Developed
Practical applications are relevant, and clearly related to the topic studied.
3 points
Category: Scientific Principles
Undeveloped
Students demonstrate no understanding of the scientific principles behind the project, or the explanation is missing.
0 points
Emerging
Students demonstrate minimal understanding of the scientific principles behind the project.
3 points
Developing
Students demonstrate a basic understanding of the scientific principles behind the project.
6 points
Well Developed
Students demonstrate a strong understanding of the scientific principles behind the project.
9 points
Engineering/Computer Science Project: Engineering Design (48 points)
Category: Research Problem and Goal
Undeveloped
The practical need/problem and is missing, and no specific goal is provided.
0 points
Emerging
The practical need/problem and goal is vague.
2 points
Developing
The practical need/problem is clearly and concisely stated, but the goal is vague.
4 points
Well Developed
A practical need or problem is clearly and concisely identified. A specific goal to address the need/problem is included.
6 points
Category: Engineering Design
Undeveloped
The designs show no understanding of the engineering process. The models, prototypes or programs do not address the intended goals, and they have not been tested, modified, and retested adequately. Quantitative data is not collected at each stage of the process to allow for comparisons.
0 points
Emerging
The designs show a weak understanding of the engineering process. The models, prototypes or programs do not address the intended goals, or they have not been tested, modified, and retested adequately. Quantitative data is not collected at each stage of the process to allow for comparisons.
4 points
Developing
The designs show a good understanding of the engineering process. The models, prototypes or programs address intended goals. However, they may not have been tested, modified, and retested adequately, or quantitative data is not collected at each stage of the process to allow for comparisons.
8 points
Well Developed
The designs show a strong understanding of the engineering process. The models, prototypes or programs address intended goals, and they are tested, modified, and retested, as needed. Quantitative data is collected at each stage of the process to allow for comparisons.
12 points
Category: Data
Undeveloped
The data is missing or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, and/or there are 5 or more errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
0 points
Emerging
The data is incomplete or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, or there are 3-4 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
3 points
Developing
The data is complete and well organized, but the tables/graphs may not be the most appropriate, or there are a 1-2 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
6 points
Well Developed
Data is complete and well organized into appropriate tables and graphs that are neat and easy to read. Tables and graphs have proper titles, measurement units, row/column/axis labels; graph axes are correctly scaled. Statistical analyses are included, when appropriate.
9 points
Category: Conclusion
Undeveloped
The data is missing or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, and/or there are 5 or more errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
0 points
Emerging
The data is incomplete or disorganized; tables/graphs are not appropriate, or there are 3-4 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
3 points
Developing
The data is complete and well organized, but the tables/graphs may not be the most appropriate, or there are a 1-2 errors in formatting (titles, labels, units, axes).
6 points
Well Developed
Data is complete and well organized into appropriate tables and graphs that are neat and easy to read. Tables and graphs have proper titles, measurement units, row/column/axis labels; graph axes are correctly scaled. Statistical analyses are included, when appropriate.
9 points
Category: Engineering Principles
Undeveloped
Students demonstrate no understanding of the engineering principles behind the project, or the explanation is missing.
0 points
Emerging
Students demonstrate minimal understanding of the engineering principles behind the project.
3 points
Developing
Students demonstrate a basic understanding of the engineering principles behind the project.
6 points
Well Developed
Students demonstrate a strong understanding of the engineering principles behind the project.
9 points